
See more trees at the Chemistry World Blog.
Rejection of rejection letter
[insert university emblem here]
Dear Professor [insert name of editor]
[Re: MS 2015_XXXX Insert title of ground-breaking study here]
Thank you for your rejection of the above manuscript.
Unfortunately we are not able to accept it at this time. As you are probably aware we receive many rejections each year and are simply not able to accept them all. In fact, with increasing pressure on citation rates and fiercely competitive funding structures we typically accept fewer than 30% of the rejections we receive. Please don’t take this as a reflection of your work. The standard of some of the rejections we receive is very high...
Read the rest at BMJ:
Rejection of rejection: a novel approach to overcoming barriers to publication
thanks to Dean McKay for finding this!
The winner for 2015 hasn't been announced yet, and voting has concluded, but you can still view the 12 finalists that are vying for the title:
It's a dance-off! Vote for you 'Dance Your Ph.D. video winner!'
Visit their website at http://www.lrp.nih.gov (hurry!) to learn more.
• Notice 16-004 provides summary information on changes to proposal forms, policies and instructions taking effect in 2016. Changes will take place in two phases, Phase 1 for applications due on or after January 25 but before May 25, and Phase 2 for applications due May 25 and after. Tables included in this notice indicate subsequent notices that detail further some of these changes, some of which are listed below.
• Notice 16-005 describes new post-award forms and instructions.
• Notice 16-006 describes the simplification of the Vertebrate Animals section of NIH proposals.
• Notice 16-008 announces a new form to use for requesting assignment to a specific awarding component and study section (or requesting it not be assigned somewhere), list of reviewers who may have a conflict, and special expertise that may be required to properly review your proposal.
• Notice 16-009 provides information about acceptable font sizes and suggests specific fonts, but provides more flexibility than previously.
• Notice 16-010 explains the change in the definition of "child" as being 18 and under instead of 21, and why.
Much of the plan is a re-commitment to data management and the availability of funds to support publication and presentation of data to the public, but the new component is the publications policy: Within a year of publication, either the version of record or the final accepted manuscript in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, and papers in juried conference proceedings, must be deposited into a publicly-accessible database.
This move is not without precedent among Federal sponsors as the NIH has had such a policy in place for years.
From the National Science Foundation's FY 2016 Budget Request to Congress brochure.
See the full notice here: NOT-OD-15-049.