Please see Notice NOT-OD-16-065 for more information on the program and how to register.
Friday, February 19, 2016
NIH Seminars on Program Funding & Grants Administration
Monday, January 25, 2016
Reminder: Changes in NIH and NSF procedures in effect 1/25/16
On the NSF side of things: The new 2016 Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) is now in effect. You can find it here.
Any unsolicited proposals sent in response to the GPG need to reflect this change on the cover sheet -- in the "Program Announcement/Solicitation/Program Description Number" box, make sure to use NSF 16-1. Solicited proposals should of course continue to use the number provided in the program announcement or description.
On the NIH side of things: Many changes! All are listed in NIH notice number NOT-OD-16-058, here is a summary:
• information about rigor and transparency in research must be included in applications;
• the vertebrate animals section has been simplified;
• the definition of "child" has been changed from a threshold of 21 to 18 years of age;
• Forms Version C application packages have been updated and the new versions should now be used;
• Instructions for Version C packages have been updated and should be followed.
These changes are just phase I for the time period January 25 through May 24. Notices regarding phase II, starting May 25, will be released shortly.
Friday, January 22, 2016
Fashion for women in STEM
Etsy store Shenova specializes in fashion inspired by the STEM disciplines, including chemistry, medicine, astrophysics, neuroscience, math and computer science.I think my favorite is the Space Time Warp dress.
via Neatorama
Monday, January 4, 2016
NIH salary cap raised for 2016
More information on this calculation may be found in the Fordham Research Manual.
More information on the NIH salary cap may be found at this notice: NOT-OD-16-145.
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Chemist-trees!

See more trees at the Chemistry World Blog.
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
Rejection of rejection
Rejection of rejection letter
[insert university emblem here]
Dear Professor [insert name of editor]
[Re: MS 2015_XXXX Insert title of ground-breaking study here]
Thank you for your rejection of the above manuscript.
Unfortunately we are not able to accept it at this time. As you are probably aware we receive many rejections each year and are simply not able to accept them all. In fact, with increasing pressure on citation rates and fiercely competitive funding structures we typically accept fewer than 30% of the rejections we receive. Please don’t take this as a reflection of your work. The standard of some of the rejections we receive is very high...
Read the rest at BMJ:
Rejection of rejection: a novel approach to overcoming barriers to publication
thanks to Dean McKay for finding this!



